|
Notes |
|
|
(0001808)
|
|
Stevee
|
|
2010-03-16 15:36
|
|
|
|
|
(0001809)
|
|
Stevee
|
|
2010-03-16 15:38
|
|
The 6 remainig errors are depending on our secrurity flags with "-fPIC" and to disable all static libraries.
Maybe we can disable these tests in testsuite. |
|
|
|
(0001810)
|
|
Stevee
|
|
2010-03-16 15:43
|
|
|
I added a file with the remaining errors they´re all within the ld-tests |
|
|
|
(0001812)
|
|
ms
|
|
2010-03-16 18:07
|
|
|
Because of the fact, that we do not need non-PIC binaries at all, we could disable these tests. |
|
|
|
(0001815)
|
|
Stevee
|
|
2010-03-17 12:33
|
|
I found something interesting in the default config file for those tests:
# The "make check" target in the Makefile passes in
# "CC=$(CC_FOR_TARGET)". But, if the user invokes runtest directly
# (as when testing an installed linker), these flags may not be set.
if {![info exists CC]} {
set CC [find_gcc]
}
if {![info exists CFLAGS]} {
set CFLAGS "-g -O2 -"
}
if {![info exists CXX]} {
set CXX [find_g++]
}
if {![info exists CXXFLAGS]} {
set CXXFLAGS ""
}
May we can change the default flags to work with our patched / hardened gcc version. |
|
|
|
(0001816)
|
|
Stevee
|
|
2010-03-17 12:39
|
|
|
I add a patchfile to disable 3 static tests from ld-elf. |
|
|
|
(0001817)
|
|
ms
|
|
2010-03-17 19:57
|
|
Comment #1815:
This has no relevance to our issue.
Comment #1816:
Does this fix all of the errors? |
|
|
|
(0001818)
|
|
Stevee
|
|
2010-03-17 22:02
|
|
No, only the 3 static tests from ld-elf.
In this test a static library / binary should be build and executed. |
|
|
|
(0001845)
|
|
Stevee
|
|
2010-03-21 14:41
|
|
|
Reopen, because testsuite still doesn´t work |
|
|
|
(0001856)
|
|
Stevee
|
2010-03-25 09:11
(edited on: 2010-03-26 12:17) |
|
|